Prudence Calabrese's Written Archive

Interesting things for interesting people

My Photo

About

Pru's Articles

  • Art and Remote Viewing
  • Aurora Bomb RV Lessons (pdf file)
  • Imagine
  • Intro to The Intergalactic Bathroom Enlightenment Guide
  • It's not just your mind, people!
  • Many Names
  • Me and My X-Ray Vision
  • Me, I'm a Radical
  • Multi-Agent Systems and Remote Viewing
  • My Department of PreCrime
  • Observations on Life
  • On Being an Intuitive Evangelist
  • Prudence Calabrese's Written Archive: On Being an Intuitive Evangelist
  • Remote Viewing Pitfalls
  • Remote Viewing: The Science
  • Six Things That Remote Viewers Should Keep
  • Tastes Like Chicken
  • The Four Types of RV Imagery
  • The Grey Dude
  • The Secret Weapons Against Criminals
  • Thoughts on Process
  • What the heck is RV?
  • When the Training Stops, the Learning Begins...
Add me to your TypePad People list

Remote Viewing: The Science

Most Americans do not realize that for over two decades one of the most highly classified intelligence projects in our government was a group of military and civilian psychics sponsored by the CIA and the Army. This group was in the business of spying on our Cold War adversaries. These “Remote Viewing” projects had a great deal of success: identifying weapons systems on the other side of the globe, finding submarines under the ocean, accurately anticipating new defense initiatives, helping find hostages, etc., so much so that most of the findings are still highly classified.

RV was developed beginning in the early 1970s. As Stanford Research International's (SRI) study revealed the promising aspects of Remote Viewing,

it seemed reasonable to the government agencies to explore ways to develop this skill that some people seemed innately to have and in others who had not yet demonstrated the ability. It hired SRI and two physicists to work with a few gifted psychics to develop a technique that could be taught to others. This method was used to train military personnel and government civilians to become effective remote viewers

The program went public in 1995.

Opinions about mechanisms of Remote Viewing (RV) are wide-ranging. Because the field is multidisciplinary, there are physical theories, psychological theories, psychophysical theories, sociological theories, and combinations of these.

• RV is a mental faculty that allows a "viewer" to describe or give details about an objective that is inaccessible to normal senses due to distance, time, or shielding


• RV is not a "psychic phenomenon", but an imposed discipline or skill that helps the viewer to facilitate or "harness" his or her own innate, underlying psi abilities. Some RV theorists think that formal RV methods are just strategies that help the viewer to more successfully and reliably access the subconscious, where it is most likely that information obtained from RV first emerges into human consciousness.


Remote Viewing differs from other, more traditional parapsychological activities in a number of ways:

• RV was developed in a research setting so that the viewer's accuracy could be verified under the watchful eye of a team of scientists.

• Unlike most other psi disciplines, RV is not just one thing, but rather an integrated "cocktail" of various phenomena. It also involves mental impressions pertaining to the other senses, such as sounds, tastes, smells, and textures, telepathy-like effects, and in some cases, intuitive "knowing."

• In RV, the viewer not only verbalizes what he or she is perceiving, but usually also records in writing, in sketches, the results of the remote viewing episode, or "session."

• RV tends to be more structured than other psi disciplines with viewers following scripted formats first developed in a laboratory setting.

• Proper RV is done within a strict science-based protocol. The remote viewer is kept unwitting of either the nature or identity of the objective until after the session is completed.

• Sessions are conducted in a setting that prevents knowledge of the target "leaking" to the viewer. These measures are important to insure that the viewer does not receive information about the target in any way other than what would be considered "psychic."

• The main way in which RV differs from traditional pyschic methodologies is that RV is teachable, verifiable and duplicatable. From its beginnings in the laboratory at SRI to today, RV contains no inherent "magic" or unexplainable mumbo-jumbo. The approach has always been scientific.

• RV is a means of doing serious science research and for performing operational-type tasks in criminal investigations, government intelligence work, commercial applications, etc.


© 2002, Prudence Calabrese

04:31 PM in The Psi World | Permalink

Multi-Agent Systems and Remote Viewing


On the possibility that remote viewers form a distributed
intelligence network with potentially new and as yet unknown emergent
properties.

What if there was more to Remote Viewing than what is commonly known?
What if there was added dimension? What if there was an explanation
for all of the extraneous information in a Remote Viewing session?
What if someone, somewhere got the whole picture?

What if it wasn't Remote Viewing at all but something else? Quantum
Viewing may be a more appropriate term.

What if a session can be many things at once, depending on how you
look at the data, who's doing the tasking, what their intention is
and whether the session enters a communications channel like a fax
machine, or a website or a copier. A channel wherein the session can
be captured and married with other sessions too numerous to count so
something other than the intended purpose emerges?

Emergent behavior is another term for self-organization, where simple
processes by multiple single agents lead to complex results.

Scientists developing models for artificial intelligence have looked
at human traffic patterns, ant colonies, flocks of birds, heart
cells, synchronized fireflies, and other forms of coordinated group
activity as a way of discovering how groups of independent animals,
or cells can create sophisticated and complex patterns and behaviors
that appear to be much greater than the sum of their parts.

One of the examples used time and time again in the discussion of
emergent behavior is that of the ant colony. By herself, a worker ant
is by no means a brilliant intellect. But thousands of ants in a
colony, each carrying out simple daily activities, can together build
structures that human engineering cannot duplicate. They will
organize their food storage areas and their dumps to be optimally
apart. They will place their queen in the safest possible location.
Ant colonies mature over generations, their structures becoming more
stable and more organized. No one ant is smart enough to know how to
create a sophisticated society. Yet a colony full of ants can create
structures and societies that not only outlast any member, but also
improve over time.

We live in a world full of such systems. Our bodies are comprised of
countless cells that operate in unison, each cell unaware of the
existence and behavior of others, yet each contributing to the
health, well-being, and activity of the entire system. Even
individual cells have thousands of genes that together manage its
life and cycle. From traffic patterns to teenage peer pressure,
emergent intelligence behaviors give rise to fascinating and unusual
complexities.

Emergent behavior has also been noted in the study of consciousness,
with some researchers postulating that consciousness itself is an
emergent behavior stemming from human social interaction.

The 'Hundredth Monkey' phenomenon is a description of a type of
emergent behavior. It means that when a limited number of people
learn a new behavior, it may remain the conscious property of these
people. But there is a point at which if only one more person learns
the new behavior, the consciousness field is strengthened so that
this new awareness is picked up by almost everyone. Some remote
viewers feel this principle is in effect within the field of remote
viewing, and increasing individual awareness of the validity of
remote viewing is creating a phenomenon where it is becoming easier
to learn and recognize remote viewing abilities.

If this is true, then remote viewers are part of an incredible and
building multi-agent system. This type of system exists when multiple
parties - in this case remote viewers - work independently or in
small groups, but the actions of each party contribute to an overall
effect, pattern, or behavior.

One key feature of these systems is that new members adapt to the
characteristics of the system, more than the system accommodating to
the changes offered by any new member. Similarity between individuals
is what results in the spread of culture across any group, and a
diversity of opinions is reduced as individuals are exposed to a
preponderance of majority arguments. In other words, as people
interact, they persuade one another of things, they teach each other,
they mimic one another, with the result being that they become more
similar.

This adaptability can have a dark side, if the weight of the network
favors a particular activity or point of view that is resistant to
diversity or change. In the case of remote viewing, new viewers may
not know what they've been adapted into, as the outward behaviors -
exercising one's intuition in new and exciting ways - becomes the
central focus for any individual. It is the rare remote viewer who
questions the cultural conditioning occurring on both the physical
and paraphysical levels, but like any other social dynamic, the
result is remote viewers becoming more similar in attitudes, beliefs,
and behaviors.

A distributed intelligence network is a multi-agent system where each
individual participates in some form of cognitive value to the entire
network, whether the individual is aware of this or not. Such a
network of remote viewers would exhibit new and surprising emergent
behaviors. One can attempt to predict what types of patterns,
attitudes, and functions such a system would display over time. One
can say for certain, however, that a network of remote viewers would
be more effective as an intelligence gathering tool if the
individuals were so similar that they used specific methodologies
developed to keep them working essentially in unison. The less the
data collection method is questioned or challenged, the more robust
the network is.

But perhaps the most interesting question is how such a system could
be utilized by certain determined members or by outside observers who
recognize the potential inherent in the system. Since a group of
remote viewers could function as a distributed intelligence network,
there could be ways to gather the bits of intelligence generated by
individual remote viewers and to use these bits of data.

Just some examples of ways that a multi-agent network of remote
viewers could be effectively used include:

Multi-Tasking Remote Viewing Data

The collection of data from such a system would be simple, and could
be done through electronic means. Remote viewers could be given
feedback on their sessions, but then new tasks could be assigned to
the data, unbeknown to the viewer. For example, a remote viewer
completes a task. The feedback is "The Mona Lisa," but a second task
is assigned such as "The Kennedy Assassination," and this second task
is not revealed to the viewer.

The easiest way to accomplish such tasking is to use the collected
data as Wild Card sessions. A Wild Card is a session that has been
completed by a remote viewer, but without a tasking yet being
assigned to the session. These have been shown to be as effective as
prior tasked sessions.

Sessions can not only be double-tasked in this manner, but can be
triple-tasked, quadruple-tasked, etc. TDS has done extensive research
in the area of multi-tasked sessions, including using sessions from
outside remote viewing groups and individuals. We have noted that
each time a new task is assigned to a pre-assigned session, that the
data then reflects both (or more) taskings, but it becomes slightly
cloudy, as if the mind is struggling with finding language and
imagery suitable to answer both (or more) taskings.

By collecting sessions from many hundreds, if not thousands, of
remote viewers, over time, and using them as Wild Cards
for multi-tasking purposes, one would not need highly trained or
skilled viewers. The copious amount of data would lend
itself to a type of pattern-finding meta analysis which could answer
specific questions without having to know any
particular viewer's strengths and weaknesses.

Remote Influence Enhanced (RI Enhanced) Sessions

Remote Viewers whose sessions are used in such a multi-tasking method
could be remote influencing themselves or others as they view, by a
simple task written by an outside party. Viewers in these cases may
experience uncomfortable physical and mental sensations during or
after viewing.

It should be noted that the initial tasker in these cases may not be
aware of any outside taskers or activity, but could be a simple agent
in the system, just as the remote viewer is.

Subtle Group Maneuvers

Since agents in a distributed intelligence network look to other
agents for clues on behavior, actions, ideas, and thoughts, some
agents could have seeded an initial network with thoughts that would
carry through the life of the network, including ideas on how remote
viewing works, who makes a good remote viewer, etc. Since remote
viewers are trained to observe and recognize non-local information,
these agents could have set up particular telepathic memes that would
be difficult to discern on a conscious level.

Future Session Tasking

Future session tasking can also be executed by writing a task where
the remote viewer has not yet viewed and has no assigned tasks yet
for the future. The tasker could assign "The next session that Viewer
X completes" to any particular objective/target, resulting in an
effective double-tasked or RI enhanced session.

Hijacked Sessions

Any session collected and then used for something else, without
permission of the remote viewer, can be considered a hijacked
session. Multi-tasked and RI Enhanced sessions can be hijacked
sessions.

One counter thought would be that a viewer's intent could allow them
to steer clear of being used in this way. However, if a viewer's
intent is to describe the objective/target, and the viewer adds the
proviso to each and every viewing that they will view only the
objective/target assigned by a specific tasker, is there any evidence
that this works? There have been no controlled studies along those
lines, and there would be no way to evaluate data to determine if
there are no further taskings placed on the data unbeknown to the
persons running the experiment. There is the added reality that on
the psi level a viewer may perform differently in a controlled
experiment (intended to measure the limitations of specific tasking
directions involving intention,) than in a true hijacked session
situation.

Intention does not operate only in the realm of individual conscious
decisions. There is also group intent, subconscious intent, spiritual
intent, and so forth, through many layers; and many mysterious layes
when paraconscious activities are involved. No one really knows what
is occurring when we 'remote view' or can even account for
consciousness and our minds in general. We do, however, know that
sessions can be multi-tasked and hijacked.

It is our hope that by being aware that a multi-agent network of
remote viewers exists, (regardless of whether any group or
institution intended to develop such a group,) its members will be
able to shape it along proper parameters where individuals are not
being used for the surreptitious benefit of others.

Final Notes:

This paper is a small part of a much larger work I've developed. I
hope that it is a springboard for thought and discussion on the
current status and future of the field and culture of remote viewing.

© 2003, Prudence C. Calabrese

12:35 PM in The Psi World | Permalink

Observations on Life

(Posted on the original Aurora Bomb Blog, August 18, 2002)

Yesterday was a strange day.

Someone decided to spam the comments section of this site with a bunch of weirdly negative posts. I think it was one person, and this person (who felt feminine in their choice of language and anxiety) used several fake names to post the violence.

I decided to do away with the comments section so that those of you interested in following along with the training could ask questions and get answers and make comments without being subjected to hurtful comments.

The comments were directed at me, and they brought up old stories and mixed them with innuendo and malice.

Why do people do stuff like that?

Of course, I ask that as if I am never guilty of negative thought and action. And the truth is that I've said hurtful things to others in this field myself. And I felt that I was correct to do so. But time brings understanding, and now my actions seem immature.

This is something I posted under the spam:

Life is complicated, isn't it? Everyone has moments in life when they question their beliefs and movement. And where we start in life is never where we end.

I like to think that Remote Viewing demonstrates to us on a deep level that we are interconnected with every person, every plant, every animal, every piece of matter in the universe. I have no way of proving this, but it feels right to me. When something or someone is stressful or stressed out in the overall system, it could mean that we all have a lot of things to work out together. There seems to be a lot of stress in the world today.

You know, all mystics - whether they are Hindu, or Catholic, or Jewish - agree on one thing: all is well, all is well. And that's the biggest mystery in our world. How can things be well when there is so much suffering, and when we find ourselves upset with so many things? I know I am like this at times, at too many times. Sometimes during Remote Viewing I overcome that limited perspective and see what the mystics teach us, but it only lasts a moment, that feeling that all is well, all is well.

My favorite prayer every night is something I read in a book by Anthony De Mello:

For all that has been: Thanks
For all that is yet to be: Yes

Peace,
Pru


So whoever you are, I welcome you to follow the training, and to hopefully learn something new about me, and about yourself in this. What we know about each other is surely a small picture of reality.

In looking back on all the negative things I've done myself (and there have been not a small amount), I recognize my own fears and insecurities and shortcomings. I'm glad I'm human and on this path.

I wish nothing but peace on all beings today.

06:27 PM in The Psi World | Permalink

Me, I'm a Radical

I posted a fun essay about sending a class of new remote viewers to visit Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky during their first sexual encounter.

I’ve received a lot of email on this article. Most of it isn’t supportive. Some people feel that I am abusing my ability as a Remote Viewer by tasking moments in human lives that have physical intimacy. Some people feel that this article places Remote Viewing as a field into a negative light.

I’m excited that this backlash has occurred, because it gives all of us opportunity to discuss larger issues of morality and ethics in Remote Viewing.

I feel that every person who is a Remote Viewer is also a philosopher. We look at human events and galactic events and can even question the great minds of History and the Future. Though we catalog the mysteries of the cosmos, we haven’t developed a philosophical code, a framework for exploration that takes into account the ethics of our own time and incorporates the possible ethics of places and times unexplored.

When philosophers discuss morality, they are looking at rules and/or beliefs that people use as a guide to behavior, particularly behavior where there are issues of good and evil, spiritual development, social harmony, etc. Philosophers try to think outside the box where particular moral systems reside, moral systems being sets of religious beliefs, social morays, secular ethics (i.e. humanist philosophies, etc.). All these systems have some things in common, and other things that are quite incompatible so far as what their adherence would say is “good” or “bad.”

From a philosophical perspective, morality is always a locally accepted set of guidelines, even though attempts are made to connect those guidelines to God, or Nature, or some other greater, deeper, truer, or “better” source.

How local do we want to be in our ethical perspective?

It’s a big universe out there.

Remote Viewing expands our perception of the universe and demonstrates to us the possibility and even likelihood that everything is connected.

I’ve viewed life on other planets. I’ve viewed lives between lives, the time before you incarnate on Earth. I’ve viewed things deep in our past, and millions of years into our future. I can’t prove any of these things exist. But they reside in the place of experience in my body. I felt them in sounds and textures and ideas and tastes.

In my deep connection to this other-extra-pre-post-worldly life, I find that our foundations of judgment are limited.

When I look at the place between lives, I see and feel souls who are making grand decisions about lessons they want to learn. 21st century American Human life feels so removed and even ridiculous in this construct. Should I carry middle-class American values and ethical constraints here?

Human souls, looking at life on earth, probably have a sense of karmic ethics, where many things that we say are “bad” by local ethical standards, they would see as being “good” in terms of the developmental or spiritual benefits. This may include using our consciousness to go beyond what we feel – in this place and time - are taboos.

Aliens – at least those I’ve met in the ether – don’t have the same ethics that we do. Some seem to be governed by a larger or different moral structure than we are able to contemplate. Should I restrict my experience and relay only that which makes ethical sense in our one place and time?

Hundreds of years in our own future, humans will still be philosophizing about what the true structure of morality is. Most likely it will be a broader, more expanded view than the small window we gaze through now. And the morality we live by in 500 years may be something that is distasteful to us today.

In today’s American society, spying on two adults having sex is considered voyeuristic, titillating, wrong. But is this what the spirits of Clinton and Lewinsky truly feel?

As Remote Viewers, are we responsible to the conscious conditioning of our own minds and the subjects we view, or are we ultimately responsible to the integrated whole? This is something that must be examined and discussed in the philosophy of consciousness. The act of Remote Viewing forces the viewer into a wholly different reality, one unlimited and more objective than that of our physical body.

Forgetting larger issues of morality, this particular case is interesting. Both Clinton and Lewinsky gave legal testimony as to the nature and actions of their sexual interactions. It was documented in the Kenneth Starr report, and posted in many electronic and print publications. Everyone in the world had direct access to the graphic description of events. Are those who read these accounts guilty of transgression? What is the difference between putting your mind to the written word and evoking feeling and sight and putting pen to paper? This particular case, as described by remote viewers and by those involved themselves in the act, was not about intimacy or true love or spiritual physical union. This was a male power trip, using an awe-struck woman, for his sexual pleasure. These “private” acts are already public. You cannot compare this to picking some unidentified couple and viewing them. There was nothing new learned by the viewers except what the data is like for a sexual encounter.

Are we remote viewing or not when we don’t put pen to page? Are we remote viewing or not when our attention wanders to people we know or would like to know during the day? How can you tell? How can you eliminate remote viewing from your life except for socially acceptable situations?

If all sexual situations are off-topic for remote viewers, then operational remote viewers will never develop the skills necessary to recognize the language and sketch of sex while viewing. Sex is a huge part of any being’s life; it is one of our primal urges, and one of our most important emotional, physical, and spiritual functions.

Our modern day and place ethical structure tells us that sex is a private issue. However, violence, death, and birth are not considered to be as private. Is this a true designation, or something that society has imposed upon us? I suggest that experience in remote viewing shows us that sex and life and learning and teaching and building and moving and dancing and eating and violence are all small pieces of human existence and story, and that none are more private than others.

Anyone who reads People Magazine or Cosmopolitan, or who watches nearly every television program, or who listens to nearly every radio program gets a peek into the ‘secret’ and ‘private’ life of movie stars, politicians, and everyday people. Why is reading and viewing this material acceptable? Do you turn off your intuition when you turn the page?

Anywhere you go, no matter what the culture or the field, there are people who are conservative and people who are liberal, people who don’t rock the boat, and those who do. Me, I’m a radical.

I postulate that the human being is a remote viewing machine, tuned in to the universe at large every moment of every waking and dreaming moment.

We are all the universe. We are all historians of the universe. During the day. During the night. Our work doesn’t begin the moment we put pen to paper. The work begins the moment we exist.

And we are all the very essence of the union of Clinton and Lewinsky, whether our local code of ethics allows us to realize this or not.

© 2002, Prudence Calabrese

06:08 PM in The Psi World | Permalink

Me and My X-Ray Vision

These eyes have seen moments of light and dark, past and future, living and the dead.

Yeah. The dead.

Three years ago a man called us. Let's call him Darren. That's not his real name.

Darren is a treasure hunter. He's fairly well-known. Like most hunters of that sort, he has a passion for gold.

He told us a story about a Spanish Mission treasure cared for by monks of the desert and overtaken by thieves. They piled the gold and jeweled crosses and swords and icons on a wagon and headed North and West, away from the Arizona wilderness. But they were soon overtaken by another band of thieves who killed them and left them to rot in the hot sun, burying one of their bodies with the treasure.

Something bad happened to the remaining men, and the treasure was never retrieved. It lay under the ground in a place near a dry riverbed.

Darren had the story and a map of the area. He didn't have much else, other than some archaic veiled references to possible landmarks near the burial site.

He wanted us to find the treasure. And as we considered whether this was something we wanted to do - because we already knew that we could, that was never a part of the debate - we asked Darren if this land were privately owned.

When you treasure hunt, finding the treasure with your super secret x-ray psychic vision is easy. Digging it up is hard work, compounded by potential terror if it resides in a place where you don't legally belong.

Darren assured us that the land was private as opposed to government property, and that we could purchase the rights to dig should we find the treasure.

His voice was sure and strong. He sounded like he'd done this a thousand times before. You could hear the echo of the sage and dust in his words.

We began our work.

Eight viewers launched their minds to the location of the treasure.

Gold is the most noble of the elements. You can't find something easier to view. It sparkles in the corners of your awareness. It calls your name. We've lost more than one viewer to Gold Fever, lost them in the Superstition Mountains, in the vaults of the Valley of the Kings.

We found gold in Darren's story, gold relics, a gold sword, crosses of gold, and oh hell yeah, gold bars, a stack so high that the viewers couldn't count how many, only knew there were enough to make us all rich beyond belief.

We also found old tools, dirty metal cans, and a dead man. Or rather a ghost.

When you come across a ghost while remote viewing, you often find that they are aware of you. They hear your mental breath and turn around with a big fat BOO! And this ghost did just that, scared two viewers right out of their sessions and back into the Real World of Southern California.


I was one of those viewers.

The ghost rose up from the ground and I wrote furiously on my page as I watched him circle around the gold bars, counting them, making sure that they were still intact. He chased toward me and I felt the hair on my arms raise in response. I stopped my session, threw my pen down and yelled out loud that I was NOT going back there, no more!

My monitor, the person helping me through the session, made me return to the chamber so that I could face my fears, but most importantly so that I could engage the ghost in dialogue.

What I didn't know at the time was that all the viewers were meeting Mr. Ghost, and each time one of us entered his sleeping place he became more and more agitated. By the time I arrived, he was angry and confused.

He told me his name was Jimmy. He told me that he had to guard the treasure. He clearly didn't know that he was dead. He was suspended between life and the time between lives. He didn't know he was free to travel the Cosmos.

I asked Jimmy what he wanted, what would make him happy.

Jimmy told me something strange and wonderful. He told me that he had fallen in love with my friend, the "other woman" I sent to his spectral prison.

The Other Woman was a woman named Dolly. Dolly isn't her real name.

Dolly is a shaman and healer, a natural psychic. She's an exotic beauty in both body and mind, with long dark hair and a ring in her nose. She lived in the tropics and gave palm and tarot readings in addition to remote viewing.

Jimmy called her a Hot Mama and the key to his salvation....

Ghosts can be tricksters. They will feed you false information if they think you are there to double cross them. They will tell you things that aren't real. They will make noise to scare you. They will stare you down. You have to be smarter than the ghost.

And in Jimmy's case, you had to be smart and sexy.

We promised Jimmy some alone time with Dolly if he would help us draw a map of the location. He quickly agreed, and we told him to expect three viewers in succession. The first two would gather the data, and the third would be his telepathic love.

Jimmy helped us. He told us what the terrain looked like above him. He told us how big his chamber was. He talked about the gold bars. He asked us if he could keep the gilded sword. We told him yes.

As we collected our data, talked to our new friend Jimmy, and while Dolly prepared a shamanistic ceremony to help Jimmy meet his maker, Darren waited. He was not a patient man.

Darren called us multiple times a day, asking when our data would be ready, when we'd be available to travel to the badlands of Arizona to dig up our feast.

We told Darren to wait, that we were working magic, that gold and all good things come to those who give us a little space. We didn't mention the ghost.

Dolly made her mental way to Jimmy, and the resulting two hours were the most incredible and intense psi experience of her life. They connected on all levels, talked about life, death, rebirth, sex, love, and passion. I won't tell you what they said.

She led him into the light.

Two weeks later, I boarded a plane for Arizona. I took my project manager, Mike, with me.

We met Darren at the airport. He was tall, rugged, with a sun hat and a cotten vest with at least fifteen pockets. He looked the part of a treasure hunter.

I carried our report and our raw data. It numbered over 500 pages in length, and contained numerous sketches of the outlying areas, the central treasure pit, and the relics therein. I didn't show Darren our work yet. I had learned the hard way that you can't trust some people in this work, especially when it comes to gold.

We traveled to the site, over dirt roads, near the hollow mountain called Mount Huachuca. And in the expanse of brown and heat we trekked for miles over mesa and into canyon until Darren showed us where he had begun to dig.

I am trained in the skills of observation and in the art of intuition. Something about this place felt off, felt odd. I knew we were not supposed to be here, plotting an excavation. I dropped the feeling and looked at Darren's dirt pile with a critical eye.

It wasn't the correct location.

Nothing about Darren's spot matched our data. The unusual row of mesas described by multiple viewers were not in view. The big rock with a strange and easy to recognize marking was not evident.

I scanned the horizon and a bolt of recognition shot through my body. I knew where I was in relation to the treasure. It was unmistakable. I grabbed Mike and said "Come on!"

He followed me as I hiked, a woman on a mission, until I found the spot where two old stagecoach roads met and I pulled a leaf of paper from my folder and showed Mike. I pointed to all the landmarks, and while Darren was still trying to catch up, I showed Mike The Rock, under which the treasure was hidden.

To the left was a broken structure, piles of stone and weather beaten wood in a heap.

I stared at the ruins, and realized I was in a place sacred and mysterious.

As Darren began to talk about his dig, and how he knew his treasure was close by, Mike and I convinced him to leave the area, and to find some food and water and rest for a while.

By this time, we realized we were hoodwinked. This was no legal treasure. We had no right to be there.

We made our way back to town as the sun was setting, and I asked Darren some hard questions about who owned the land.

The government. It was protected property.

And as I sat, slack-jawed, I listened to Darren's plan to unearth the treasure in the middle of the night and to load it on a flat bed truck and to zip it out of sight and into the bowels of Mexico where black market operators were ready to sell the gold bars to the highest bidder.

We left the desert. Left the client standing in waves of heat and misery, holding his maps, swearing he'd find the treasure without our help. In no way were we going to be a part of that. We made our way back to California, in relative sanity.

The next week, I got a personal call from the goverment authorities, asking me about the treasure I planned to dig up on government owned land.

"No way!" I told them

"I stopped the plan!"

I reasoned my way out of the situation, and recieved a big fat warning from the man for my effort.

I don't know who called the authorities on us. Darren denied the charge. Maybe someone saw us hike into the desert with shovels and maps. I don't know.

Some weeks later, after the dust had settled, we turned our report over to a university-sponsored archeologist who planned to survey the area as part of a preservation effort in conjunction with the Burea of Land Management.

Gold Fever. Ghosts. Sexy exotic viewers. Government Agents. Treasure Hunters.

Just another project for those of us with x-ray vision.

06:05 PM in The Psi World | Permalink

Six Things That Remote Viewers Should Keep

Wherever you are is the entry point!
- Kabir

Six Things That Remote Viewers Should Keep

Keep a sense of not knowing what will happen next!

Remote viewing allows you to pass through the doorway from the known to the unknown. Remote viewing practice can erase concepts, projections, prejudices, and presupposed knowledge. Allow yourself to wander around the objective, allow yourself to not know what will happen next. The element of surprise is your best friend!

Keep a sense of direct action in your sessions.

By not preparing, manipulating, changing, or morphing the data as it comes to you in your session, you will free your session from the constraints of your own mind. Let your pen write the words and draw the pictures that first leap into your mind. Be careful not to edit your thoughts or to change the data in any way.

Keep a sense of no judgements in your work.

You don't need to judge your data before your session is complete. What you write on your page, when your action is direct from your mind and then through your pen, needs and deserves no judgement. You get what you get.

Keep a sense of not working for results, and enjoy the process.

Remote view for the sake of the doing it, for the fun and excitement of exercising your mental potential. If you remote view only for results, your data will lose its spark and serendipity, and the act of remote viewing will feel like a chore.

Keep a sense of acceptance of every one of your sessions.

No matter how wonderful or terrible you feel your data is, remember that each session is a part of your journey as a remote viewer. Every session can teach you wonderful things about yourself and how you perceive reality.

Keep a sense of no preference with regard to your data.

Be able to allow any kind of data - even if it's dark, or sexual, or strange, or awkwards, or beautiful - to appear in your work. Our universe is full of such rich experience, to limit any one of them is to limit a part of your own being.

06:04 PM in The Psi World | Permalink

It's not just your mind, people!

Remote viewing is an intensely physical practice. It burns a lot of calories. Sometimes I wake up from a session covered in sweat, exhausted, as if I ran twelve miles uphill. Sometimes I get a headache, or perhaps my breathing quickens.

The sessions begin with those crazy doodles, mind-free body expressions of what it is that you are viewing. If you're a good viewer, you'll never let your hand stop giving you information, and you'll coax it out of your ankles and love handles and earlobes.

It's all locked in your body. You have to learn how to work it out, piece by piece, like breaking open a fortune cookie and extracting the paper.

I like to keep my body ready for anything! I never know when I'll be asked to run through the ether in chase of a fugitive or swim in the ocean with a pod of dolphin.

Here are a few fun exercises I do at least once a month to keep my body surprised and fresh:


Backwards Practice

Try doing everything in reverse for an hour. Walk backwards. Use your non-dominant hand to write or to drink a glass of water. Cross your legs the other way. Read a page or two out loud, right to left across the page. If you're getting dressed, start with your socks - unless you ALWAYS start with socks!

Moving in reverse will startle your brain, push you out of your normal patterns.


Slo Mo

Take an hour and do everything in slooooooow motion. Breath deliberately, slowly, filling your lungs gently and completely, allowing time to let your breath out. Walk at a snail's pace. Breath. Take a step. Breath. Slowing your life to an extreme will enrich the colors and motion around you.


Blind!

Wear a blindfold for an hour. Work through your regular routine, walking, making coffee, petting your dog.

Now..... Add Viewing!

Now do all of the three exercises above, one at a time, while you view! View backward! Matrix first! View slooooowly, deliberately, without rushing the sensations. View blind with a blindfold, use your hands and pen to feel the paper in a less intellectual and more physically effective way.


See how these practices can alter your perceptions while you view, can give you new perspective, new emotion, new physical sensations. You'll find yourself drawing on these skills the next times you sit to view a 'regular' session.


Your work will be more tactile, more free, less rational, rich in physical detail.

06:03 PM in The Psi World | Permalink

On Being an Intuitive Evangelist

My vision for the future of remote viewing includes a new kind of a world where people are free to be completely themselves, because they are seen for exactly who and what they are.

My vision for the future includes a new kind of a reality where we are fully cognizant of the connections with each other and with God (the universe, pick your favorite "big idea thing"). Our awareness in this future will contain a deep understanding of the fact that when we lift others up we lift ourselves up. Our celebration of connection will create a world with no hatred, with no bigotry.

I used to think that remote viewing could change the world - that we would discover all these amazing things about ETs and God and the Universe and we would be essentially omniscient. And then I discovered that it really was the same old book, different cover, and that we already had all the spiritual teachers and lessons and abilities that we needed, that remote viewing was just a fun an interesting skill you could practice and, like any other discipline (martial arts, music, whatever) it could change YOUR world.

And then I rediscovered that remote viewing not only changes YOUR world, it really DOES change THE world, in ways I never understood before. I have trained a few hundred people at this point, since the beginning of my time in remote viewing. The more I interact with those who took on the practice, the more I see how the world is being changed on a microcosmic level. Little by little, people are seeing things differently - thanks to remote viewing. Little by little, people are living a more conscious life - thanks to remote viewing. Little by little, these people are interacting with other people and it's rubbing off. Every day now I hear from someone else, how this information made their world a better place.

It goes way beyond the sparkle of "seeing" angels and ETs and disasters and politicians' peccadillos. It effects you on a deep, deep level, and once you learn remote viewing, you are NOT the same person. You can't be the same. You have experienced your connection to God, and this makes you an evangelist. You don't realize your an evangelist, but you are. You're more empathic. You're more understanding. Your intuition surprises you with its accuracy and purity. You find yourself opening up to more and more people and ideas because you start losing your sense of personal boundary. You don't care about your own secrets anymore.

Now imagine a world where a thousand people have changed in these ways.

Now imagine a world where a million people have changed in these ways.

Now, you can argue that religion does the same thing - and for sure, it does. But only if you immerse yourself in your practice of religion, and this is not an easy thing to do. With remote viewing, you are forced to practice, and it doesn't require a leap of faith. Your body makes that leap without your consent at first, and then your mind must follow. This is the real power in remote viewing.

I wanted to be a scientist in this field. I wanted to stay in the proper protocol and make little determinations - always careful, always quiet. I still do those things, and will continue to do so. But I can no longer be quiet about what remote viewing can do for YOU and for the world.

©1999, Prudence Calabrese

08:24 PM in The Psi World | Permalink

The Four Types of RV Imagery

Type 1: The Abstract Picture or Symbol

This can be a figure, a color, a pattern, or a symbol. Because they are so abstract or symbolic, these types of images are sometimes ignored or misunderstood. Abstract or symbolic images are usually much clearer and brighter than actual visual images from the site you are remote viewing. If the image you see appears in 3-D, colorized format, first consider it a symbolic representation of the objective.

An example of this kind of image occurred in a session on Rosa Parks, the civil rights activist. The viewer kept deducting the word "rose" and drew several sketches of roses. Another example commonly happens in death related objectives: some viewers will draw crosses and other religious symbolics.

Because this type of image frequently occurs, we have added the Symbolics column to the matrix in the TDS RV System.

Type 2: The Visual Memory Image

Sometimes your conscious mind tries to tell you what your paraconscious mind is perceiving by giving you an example from your past. The more experience you have in your life, the more visual images are stored in your memory. To unlock the meaning behind the visual memory, concentrate on the feelings, associations, and circumstances surrounding it. The visual memory image often appears as an analogy - that the site you are remote viewing is like something in your past, or something you are familiar with.

Type 3: Actual Visual Image

This is an actual representation of the site you are remote viewing. These images are usually faint and fuzzy. Often the only thing apparent in these images is the overall outline, or gestalt, of the site you are remote viewing.

Type 4: The Premonition Image

This image is most often associated with episodes of spontaneous remote viewing, and it is usually associated with strong emotions and vibrations. Examples of this type of image are seeing loved ones accompanied by the feeling that something is terribly wrong, or seeing a disastrous event such as a volcano erupting or a plane crash. The person experiencing this kind of spontaneous image is usually deeply effected emotionally by the event.

©1999, Prudence Calabrese

08:23 PM in The Psi World | Permalink

What the heck is RV?

Imagine being able to tell what's happening at a distance, or being able to intimately describe any event in the past or the future from the comfort of your own home, using only your mind! Over 20 years ago, the U.S. military decided to see if they could train people to be "psychic spies" who could do such things. They spent over 20 million dollars of taxpayer money to research and test this idea, and in the course of this research, they found out that anyone could "learn" to be psychic using a special set of techniques.

The act of using these techniques, and describing anything, anytime, and any person or being, is called "remote viewing." The word "viewing" is not the best description of this process, because the remote viewer not only gets images, she can also perceive smells, tastes, sounds, and all the other senses as well as emotional and conceptual data.

Typically, the person doing the psychic "travelling" is called a remote viewer. The remote viewer often works with a monitor, which is a person who guides them around the target site. The person who decides what the viewer is going to visit is called the tasker. The place that the viewer is meant to describe is called the target, or the objective. One of the coolest things about the whole process is that the viewer is usually "blind," meaning that she has no idea where she is going to travel with her mind! It could be anything! Anyplace! Anytime! And yet, she describes all the aspects of the target in detail! Many times the monitor is even blind, and the process still works.

©1999, Prudence Calabrese

08:22 PM in The Psi World | Permalink

»

Go Visit!

  • Grey Dude
  • Prudence Calabrese's Official Site

Archives

  • May 2004
Subscribe to this blog's feed